due to technical reasons, the below is not an exact reproduction of the posted article but contains all its text.
Then-European Commissioner for Internal Market Thierry Breton at the EU Commission headquarter in Brussels, Belgium, in 2023. Photo: Thierry Monasse/Getty Images
The Trump administration imposed visa restrictions Tuesday on five Europeans the State Department accused of leading "efforts to coerce American platforms to censor" or "suppress" U.S. viewpoints they oppose.
The big picture: Among those now barred from entering the U.S. is former EU Commissioner Thierry Breton, whom under secretary of state for public diplomacy Sarah Rogers on X called "a mastermind of the Digital Services Act," which imposes requirements on social media platforms, including content moderation.
The former top EC tech regulator, who served as commissioner for the internal market from 2019-2024, clashed with Trump ally Elon Musk over complying with European Union rules.
Breton, who served in the late conservative French President Jacques Chirac's government, suggested on Musk's X platform that the Trump administration's action was a "witch hunt."
Screenshot: Thierry Breton/X
State of play: The European Commission announced earlier this month it had issued X with a fine of €120 million ($141 million), its first penalty under the DSA.
The fine was issued on the same day as the Trump administration released its National Security Strategy, which accused the EU of censoring free speech.
X responded by shutting down the EC's ad account and Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the fine "an attack on all American tech platforms and the American people."
Rubio said in a statement Tuesday the five Europeans were "radical activists" who had "weaponized NGOs [that] have advanced censorship crackdowns by foreign states."
He said in each case they had targeted American speakers and U.S. companies.
Of note: Rubio didn't name the individuals affected by the ban, but Rogers did in a series of X posts.
The others Rogers named were: Imran Ahmed, chief executive of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, whom Musk sued in 2023 after it documented hate speech on X; Clare Melford, who leads the U.K.-based Global Disinformation Index; and Josephine Ballon and Anna-Lena von Hodenberg, leaders of German nonprofit HateAid.
Zoom in: Rubio said in his statement, "President Trump has been clear that his America First foreign policy rejects violations of American sovereignty. Extraterritorial overreach by foreign censors targeting American speech is no exception."
He wrote on X that for "far too long, ideologues in Europe have led organized efforts to coerce American platforms to punish American viewpoints they oppose."
The Trump administration "will no longer tolerate these egregious acts of extraterritorial censorship," Rubio added.
What they're saying: French Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs Jean-Noël Barrot said on X Tuesday France "strongly" condemns the visa restrictions.
"The Digital Services Act (DSA) was democratically adopted in Europe to ensure that what is illegal offline is also illegal online," he said.
"It has absolutely no extraterritorial reach and in no way concerns the United States."
Hodenberg and Ballon said in a media statement the action marked an "act of repression by a government that is increasingly disregarding the rule of law and trying to silence its critics by any means necessary."
They added: "We will not be intimidated by a government that uses accusations of censorship to silence those who stand up for human rights and freedom of expression."
French President Emmanuel Macron similarly condemned the U.S. move, writing on X Wednesday that the "measures amount to intimidation and coercion aimed at undermining European digital sovereignty."
He added, that the "rules governing the European Union's digital space are not meant to be determined outside Europe."
What we're watching: Rubio said in his statements the State Department "stands ready and willing to expand" its visa restrictions list if others did not reverse course.
A bold Ukrainian operation in Kursk has humiliated Russian President Vladimir Putin and upended some of the logic of the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine. Column by Ishaan Tharoor The Washington Post , August 14, 2024 at 12:00 a.m. EDT; see also Ukrainian soldiers pose for a picture as they repair a military vehicle near the Russian border on Sunday. (Viacheslav Ratynskyi/Reuters) Russia’s Kursk oblast is no stranger to war. In medieval times, the district was overrun by the Mongol horde, and was claimed and ceded down the centuries by Eurasian empires. During World War II, the environs of the city of Kursk became the site of the greatest tank battle in history, as Nazi Germany suffered a grievous strategic defeat at the hands of the bloodied yet unbowed Soviet Union . This past week, Kursk has been the site of the first major invasion of Russian territory since then. This time, it’s not the Nazi war machine rolling in — no matter what Kremlin propagandists insi...
Analysis by Nick Paton Walsh , CNN Updated 9:19 PM EDT, March 18 Orig inal article contains additional links and illustrations . See also Thomas L. Friedman , I Don’t Believe a Single Word Trump and Putin Say About Ukraine, The New York Times , March 18; and also A “no” is not a “yes” when it is a “maybe,” a “probably not,” or an “only if.” This is the painfully predictable lesson the Trump administration’s first real foray into wartime diplomacy with the Kremlin has dealt. They’ve been hopelessly bluffed. They asked for a 30-day, frontline-wide ceasefire, without conditions. On Tuesday, they got – after a theatrical week-long wait and hundreds more lives lost – a relatively small prisoner swap, hockey matches, more talks, and – per the Kremlin readout – a month-long mutual pause on attacks against “energy infrastructure.” This last phrase is where an easily avoidable technical minefield begins. Per US President Donald Trump’s post and that of his ...
Ukrainian and European officials say President Vladimir V. Putin has become emboldened by a lack of Western pushback. The police inspected the damage to a house caused by debris from a shot-down Russian drone in the village of Wyryki-Wola, eastern Poland on Wednesday. Credit... Wojtek Radwanski/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images By Andrew E. Kramer Reporting from Kyiv, Ukraine The New York Times , Sept. 11, 2025 Updated 8:49 a.m. ET An American factory in western Ukraine. Two European diplomatic compounds and a key Ukrainian government building in Kyiv. And now Poland. Over a roughly three-week period, Russian drones and missiles have struck sites of increasing sensitivity for Ukraine and its Western allies, culminating in the volley of Russian drones that buzzed early Wednesday over Poland, a NATO country. For decades, American and European military planners feared something else: a bolt-from-the-blue assault, like an all-out nuclear strike, from the Soviet Union or ...
Comments
Post a Comment